The Grand Denouement

As he came to me waiting on the couch
Of itself the corded knot fell apart,
The girdle snapped, and down and down
My skirt went gliding inch by inch
Until my hips arrested its shameless course
Thus much I remember, sweet friend, no more.
Once in his arms, our nudities interlocked,
I was lost to the outside world
Who was he? who am I?How went the coital act?
Not a thing I know - nothing, nothing at all.

The entree

And now the entree

" Torrid witnesses of our amative nights
Strewn thick with fallen sandal dust
This bed, my darling, is not soft anymore
For your lissom limbs to be laid upon
"What a ruse! saying thus my rouguish paramour
Upon his prostrate chest clasps me tight
Sucking my lips - the while his toes
As tongs draw down my skirt.
And then
He goes on to do the things
He though most meant to do.

An Aperitif

Amaruka who wrote in Sanskrit about eroticism.

First an aperitif:

Pshaw for the gods, vishnu or Siva or Skanda?

Engrain instead into thy innermost being

The face of this slender waisted wench.

Astride the now in coitus reverse

Watch her earrings swaying back and forth.

Her straggling curls of hair

Moist with the merest mist of sweat

And ever so lightly rubbing off

The sandal mark on her forehead.

Watch the langour of passion in her eyes.

As the orgasmic spill of ecstasy

Draws near, yet near, yet near.

May that faceGive thee comfort for ever and ever.

Origin of AIDS

The Origin of AIDS Either all, or nearly all, of the AIDS virus, on this planet, can be traced back to the United Nations administered Small Pox vaccine.If you make a graph of the number of cases of aids per year, that graph does not regress back gradually to one case. It regresses back to thousands of infections, starting at the time of the United Nations administered Small Pox vaccine, in Africa. It is also significant that The United Nations had published a plan to reduce the world's population. It's all about population reduction.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------"The United Nation's goal is to reduce population selectively by encouraging abortion, forced sterilization, and control of human reproduction, and regards two-thirds of the human population as excess baggage, with 350,000 people to be eliminated per day."- Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier, Nov. 1991"It’s terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. This is so horrible to contemplate that we shouldn’t even say it. "- Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier, Nov. 1994. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The origin of The AIDS virus, also appears to be a United Nations supervised facility, at the army's biowarfare lab at Fort Detrick, Maryland.Biowarfare is ALWAYS supervised by the United Nations; by way of a treaty (United Nations Convention). There are two such labs in the world:Fort Detrick, Maryland and Sverdlosk, Russia.Both are staffed by the same people, and both are supervised by the United Nations. AIDS was not originally transferred to man via a monkey in AfricaThat was the original theory, which has been discredited.The DNA CODON SEQUENCE of the "AIDS like" virus in the green monkey is not similar to The DNA CODON SEQUENCE of "AIDS" virus in humans. The DNA CODON SEQUENCE "AIDS" virus in humans is 50% similar to sheep Visna, and 50% similar to Bovine Leukemia.This indicates that the most probable origin of AIDS was a recombinant synthesis between to sheep Visna and Bovine Leukemia. This part could have been done by accident. It would only involve mixing sheep Visna infected plasma with Bovine Leukemia infected plasma. Of course this is ALSO an interspecies cross up.HERE IS THE PROBLEM;Recombinant synthesis usually produces nothing else except "incompetents"(Virus that cannot live, cannot reproduce, or cannot live anywhere ELSE except where they were formed)The next step could not have been an accident. The next step would have had to be REPLICATE PASSAGE.REPLICATE PASSAGE involves gradually changing the medium of an "incompetent"; which cannot live anywhere ELSE except where they were formed.In this way the virus in adapted to live in a new species.Thus an incompetent virus that originated from interspecies cross up involving sheep and cows, can be made to be capable of living in Humans.http://www.konformist.com/1999/aids/manmade.txtWilliam Campbell Douglas, M.D., National Health Federation's 1985 Doctor ofthe Year, published AIDS:The End of Civilization, 1989, detailing thedevelopment of HIV by scientists working at the army's biowarfare lab atFort Detrick, Maryland.John Seale, M.D. concludes AIDS was man-made in "Origins of the AIDSViruses, HIV-1 and HIV-2: Fact or Fiction?" (The British Journal of theRoyal Society of Medicine 81:617-619, 1988) .Lieutenant Colonel Thomas E. Bearden (U.S. Army, retired) published AIDSBiological Warfare in 1988 which maintains that HIV was developed inAmerican biowarfare labs. Bearden holds a Master of Science degree innuclear engineering and a Bachelor of Science degree in mathematics, andheads an aerospace firm in Georgia.Dr. Leonard Horowitz, DMD, MA, MPH, a Harvard graduate, published EmergingViruses: AIDS & Ebola -- Nature, Accident or Genocide in 1996. OutpostSBook Review calls it: "The most massive, well-documented assembly ofevidence ever published in support of the idea that the AIDS virus couldhave been manufactured as a biological weapon... If you scoff at the notion,you won't be so cocky once you see how much evidence exists."Washington State Supreme Court Justice William Goodloe (retired) wrote aletter in 1990 supporting published articles by award-winning journalist,Peter MacKenzie: "I have heard and seen reports of the possible artificialorigin of the AIDS virus, but until this report have not seen suchcompelling evidence of its truth. Mr. MacKenzie has assembled a remarkabledocumentation of heretofore unpublished data, and an immediate governmentalinvestigation at the highest level should be commenced."Samuel Evans, Chairman of the National Council of Public Auditors, sent thefollowing letter to every member of Congress in 1989:"I address this letter to you requesting a Congressional investigation intothe 'allegations' that our government is financing research and developmentthrough genetic heredity engineering to multiply certain viruses to killspecific racial groups...The multitude of allegations, statements, newsarticles and personal testimony demands prompt clarification. For instance,it is alleged: 1. That Col. David L. Huxsoll, commander of the U.S. Army ResearchInstitute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Md., has received $60million for research in biological ethnic weapons. 2. That it might be possible to wage ethnic warfare by developingsubstances that affect one race more than another. According to Newsweekmagazine, Jan. 16, 1989, an example would include 'Valley fever, which ismuch more likely to kill blacks than whites.' Another substance, developedat a southern California university, is believed to kill only people withmelanin in their skin. 3. That it is a coincidence that Fort Detrick, which is where Col.Huxsoll's biological research is being conducted, is also the site of AIDSresearch.... These allegations go to the very root of our constitutional form ofgovernment and basic world human rights, and must be responded to by electedgovernmental officials on all levels. Nothing less than a Congressionalhearing and investigation that may lead to a full world conference in theUnited Nations is needed to clarify and defuse the alleged mentally derangedplan of world depopulation by ethnic weapons." (Published in the ExecutiveIntelligence Review, 3/17/89)The Report of the President's Chemical Warfare Commission admits, "Therapid advances of genetic technology -- in which the US for now isfortunately the leader -- offer the predictable likelihood of new agentsbeing developed for which no vaccines or counteragents are known oravailable." (Govt. Printing Office, 1985)Erwin Chargaff, Professor Emeritus of Columbia University and recipient ofthe National Medal of Science for his work with DNA, warned of suchresearch: "I should say that the spreading of experimental cancer may beconfidently expected." (New York Times Magazine, 8/22/76)The Foundation for Economic Trends, in a 1987 lawsuit, forced theDepartment of Defense to divulge its operation of 127 chemical andbiological warfare research sites in the U.S., including universities andcorporations, as reported by Science Magazine (2/27/87).http://www.oakvillegreen.com/food_safety.htmAids and Green MonkeysIn his earth-shaking book, "AIDS: The End of Civilization", Dr. William Campbell Douglass asked, "Do you really think some green monkey all of a sudden bit some guy in the ass and presto, AIDS all over the world?"Dr. Douglass was examining the hype that the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta have been peddling to the public about the AIDS virus, HIV. Douglas's book tells the "whole" story of the development of HIV at the Ft. Detrick (Maryland) military installation. His story is well documented and confirms the theme of the futuristic movie "Outbreak".The Strecker memorandum - aids is man made---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------VISITwww.getusout.org ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/09/24/aids_made_in_america_journal_of_degenerative_diseases.htm AIDS 'Made In America' - Journal of Degenerative DiseasesAIDS is a US government operation directed towards population control,which springs from secret research into disease causing agentsconducted in government biowar laboratories. That is the view ofDonald W. Scott, M.A., M.Sc. of the Common Cause Medical ResearchFoundation, a group in Canada which publishes the Journal ofDegenerative Diseases. In a special edition made available fordownload here by Progressive Convergence, http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/Aids-made-in-America-Jourv5n3.pdfthe 36-page journal attempts to make a murky chapter in recent medical history more clearly understandable - up to a point. Scott has delved deeply into the paper trail left by what seems to be a government funded effort to develop disabling diseases and to find ways to transmit these to a targetpopulation, time coincident with the appearance of "AIDS" on the worldscene.We learn about Thomas Merigan, who wrote in 1971 about "Viralinfections in man associated with acquired immunological deficiencystates", about Robert Huebner's research for the US Navy intospontaneously degenerating adenoid tissue aggravating respiratorydisease in submarine crew, as well as Bjorn Sigurdsson's Rockefellersponsored research into brucella bacteria causing visna (danish forwasting) sheep disease. Hilary Koprowski developed and tested a poliovaccine and "lost his records". Belgian and Portuguese research thatcompleted what US scientists were finding and a small pox eradicationcampaign that may have been the vehicle for a disease causing agent toget to Africa. Henry Kissinger figures prominently and Robert Gallo isof course a king pin, linking the Nixon "war on cancer" researchprogram with the eventual appearance of AIDS.I cannot possibly do the work of Scott justice just naming a few ofthe highlights. His account makes very interesting reading and itappears that a book is in preparation that will lay our the story inall its gory detail.That there was indeed a US Special Virus program is confirmed by BoydGraves, who has been researching the matter independently. Histimeline of the development of a disabling disease agent that he saysbecame AIDS is available here, http://www.boydgraves.com/timeline/while his flow chart http://www.boydgraves.com/flowchart/download.htmland other publications can be had for a fee.- - -What really causes Aids?Whether AIDS is indeed caused by a virus coming out of a governmentprogram, that is, whether the program was successful and is now infull swing, or whether it is - as Jonathan Campbell says - the resultof an accidentally "escaped" bioweaponized swine fever virus isimmaterial for now. It might be neither of these two. I still havesome doubts, not about the existence of the program, but about themechanism that makes people ill. I have challenged Graves saying thatyes, there may have been a government effort to develop such a virus,but what about the abundant data that shows- HIV was never properly isolated- HIV is not present in sufficient numbers in the blood of'infected' victims to explain the damage done- there is no proper test to unequivocally prove infection with HIV- AZT and other anti-retroviral drugs are highly toxic killing thepatient rather than the virus- those of the 'infected' that keep away from drugs and strengthentheir own immune system by proper nutrition and other naturalintervention seem to survive and indeed rarely if ever progress tothose 'opportunistic' diseases that make up AIDS.All those things would seem to indicate that quite possibly, HIV mayhave nothing to do with what's called the clinical picture of AIDS andthat most of the damage could actually be done by the cure that is soardently advocated by one and all - that cure which is not a cure atall, but it is the only accepted way of medical intervention. PeterBarry Chowka put this quite succinctly in a recent article, when he said:http://members.aol.com/pbchowka/live8hiv-aids070105.html"Incredibly, the conventional war on AIDS, like no other issue inhistory, has succeeded in uniting left and right, liberals andconservatives, and evangelicals and nonbelievers in a lock-step marchtoward institutionalizing the pharmaceutical drug treatment paradigmworldwide right down to every last person on earth. If this soundslike an exaggeration, consider the fact that the expressed objectiveof policymaking HIV/AIDS control proponents is to test everyone on theplanet for HIV and treat everyone who tests HIV positive withantiretroviral drugs, even infants who test HIV negative if theirmothers test positive. It is an absolute act of modern heresy andguaranteed career suicide for anyone in any position of power andauthority to challenge the dominant HIV/AIDS mega-spin including thebelief in the monolithic HIV/AIDS-test-and-treat-with-drug strategythat is now completely operant at every level of public policy aroundthe world."Genocide or accident?Are we looking at viral genocide? a viral accident? pharmaceuticalgenocide? medical incompetence? population reduction in action? Wejust can't know with certainty with the data available to us so far.So by all means therefore, let researchers dig into the murky historyof what seems to have been a government program with destructive intent.One useful thing to do would be to find out whether there is any truthto the viral causation of Aids and what particle may be the culprit.Is it the mycoplasma, the visna virus, is it the Gallo/Montagnier HIV,or a combination? More importantly, what is the mechanism by whichthat viral agent or that particular combination causes thedestruction. In that sense, it would be immensely useful to know whatwent on behind closed doors in the US biolabs for at least a decadeand a half before the sudden emergence of AIDS.But in the meantime, are we to let thousands upon thousands die fromno treatment or wrong treatment? I don't think so. We shouldconcentrate on cures that work without causing further degradation ofthe patient's immune system. Whether it be selenium and othernutrients as advocated by Harold Foster,http://www.hdfoster.com/a silver colloid patented inthe US as a possible cure for AIDS and advocated by Graves, amultivitamin, http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2004/07/01/harvard_research_in_tanzania_confirms_multivitamin_slows_aids_progression.htmor simply bettering the standard of living and the dietof people in Africa and indeed around the world, it does not matter.Let's just get going with something we know works, and let's notpoison the patient in the meantime, please.But resolve it we must, the riddle of AIDS, if only to prevent thenext hyped up epidemic.http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/03/02/bird_flu_sars_biowarfare_or_a_pandemic_of_propaganda.htmHere again the link to the special issue:http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/Aids-made-in-America-Jourv5n3.pdfAIDS Made in America - Journal of Degenerative DiseasesThe recent release by Progressive Convergence:http://www.progressiveconvergence.com/press-AIDS-made-in-America.htmProgressive Convergence release - Whistleblowing: AIDS, Made in Americaand Harold Foster's book suggesting a nutritional protocol for AIDSpatients:What really causes AIDS - Harold Fosterhttp://www.hdfoster.com/index.html#PublicationsAs I mentioned Jonathan Campbell's hypothesis of AIDS causation, herea discussion of it from a recent email:Accidental release of swine fever virus? - Jonathan CampbellI came at the AIDS puzzle from a completely different angle. When Ifirst started doing research on AIDS, I was fascinated and horrifiedwith the fact that it seemed to appear first on Haiti and then spreadto San Francisco and New York. A doctor treating two of the first AIDSpatients - two Haitian immigrants in Boston - Dr. Joseph Viera,suggested that the disease had been carried to SF and NYC by gay mentraveling to Haiti, since it was a popular vacation spot. He had noidea why it was in Haiti in the first place. Then when I was in NYCfor a protest demonstration in the early 80s I found a flyer thatclaimed that African Swine Fever Virus (ASFV) had been cultured inHaiti in the late 60s and early 70s for use in biological war againstCuba. ASFV kills pigs by wrecking their immune systems. This wassubstantiated by an article several years later, citing that the UShad sent the National Guard to Haiti to exterminate the native wildpig population of Haiti because it was infested with ASFV. There wereother articles as well: research by Drs. Jane Teas and John Beldekasthat they had discovered ASFV infection in men who had AIDS, clustersof AIDS and ASFV in Belle Glade, Florida where Haitian immigrants hadsmuggled pigs from the island, and prevalence of ASFV in Zaire amongpigs where the epidemic of AIDS seemed to be centered at the time inAfrica.There was a missing link, however. Where on earth did Gallo's newretrovirus, HIV, come from, and why did it seem to be prevalent amongmen who had AIDS? It seemed to be similar to a retrovirus prevalent ingreen monkeys. Then I read that there had been a big controversy aboutthe use of chimpanzees in research, as they were an endangeredspecies. Green monkeys, which were plentiful and not facingextinction, became the choice for animal experiments and, as it turnedout, green monkey kidney became the popular growth medium for virusresearch. BINGO. The green monkey retrovirus was obviously used as theculture medium for the CIA's ASFV biowarfare agent, adding greenmonkey retrovirus into the mix. This mixture was undoubtedly tried outon wild Haitian pigs to see if it worked, and one or more of themprobably escaped. Or the CIA released them purposely to see what wouldhappen, since Haiti was considered expendable.The rest is history. Either through ingestion or blood ritual, Haitianpeople became the first victims (in the Western Hemisphere, that is).I stated above many of the other connections as well, supporting thishistorical origin. Gallo's new virus, HIV, possibly a mutant of thegreen monkey retrovirus, was found to be prevalent in AIDS patientsand declared to be the cause of AIDS, but prevalence does not meanvirulence or causation. The emerging AIDS establishment at the CDC,led by Gallo, had to come up with weird explanations of how a weak,lame retrovirus could possible cause disease years later. In 1986,faced with the possibility that researchers were going to develop analternative origin model, Gallo and his following met at Cold SpringHarbor and *declared* that no funding was to be given to anyoneworking on a non-HIV causation of AIDS, and these alternativeresearchers were essentially drummed out. AZT, a failed cancer drug,was tested in a fraudulent manner in Boston, and wild claims of itsefficacy provided the backdrop for the declaration that it was thefirst-line defense against HIV, now very firmly entrenched as the"cause" of AIDS.If what I have stated above is true, what we have is thepossibility that AIDS is the unintended result of biological warfare.The vast majority of alternative AIDS researchers such as Duesberg -those who understand that HIV cannot be the cause of AIDS - believethat AIDS does not have a special viral cause at all. Their claim -and they have lots of good evidence - is that in the US it is causedby toxic trauma and/or malnutrition, and that in developing countriesit is just a convenient label given to people who are dying of mundanecauses - malnutrition, typhoid, TB, - all of the ordinary, knowndiseases of poverty.---------------------------------------------------The Virus Cancer Program 1964-1980The Birthplace Of AIDS And The Kaposi's Sarcoma Epidemic'Two new viral epidemics erupting exclusively in homosexuals is an unprecedented event in medical science. Such a bizarre and unlikely scenario strongly suggests to me that that the two epidemics of HIV and KS are more likely to have occurred due to the deliberate or accidental "introduction" of new viruses into gay men"-and not from two viruses suddenly appearing "out of Africa."' The Virus Cancer Program1964-1980The Birthplace Of AIDS And The Kaposi's Sarcoma EpidemicBy Alan Cantwell, MD(c) 2005 All Rights Reserved9-27-5The epidemic of HIV/AIDS and the epidemic of "gay cancer" Kaposi's sarcoma (KS) is widely known as the "gay cancer" that often accompanied AIDS when the first cases broke out in gay men in Manhattan in 1979. In 1994 a new "human herpes-8" virus was discovered that is now widely accepted as the cause of all forms of KS. However, it is extremely important to note that the new KS herpes virus (KSHV) is separate and distinct from the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the virus that causes AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome). Therefore, it is now important to recognize that two new viruses were "introduced" into gays that produced not only the epidemic of HIV/AIDS, but also the new epidemic of KS ("gay cancer"). Two new viral epidemics erupting exclusively in homosexuals is an unprecedented event in medical science. Such a bizarre and unlikely scenario strongly suggests to me that that the two epidemics of HIV and KS are more likely to have occurred due to the deliberate or accidental "introduction" of new viruses into gay men"-and not from two viruses suddenly appearing "out of Africa." The widely-held theory is that HIV originated in African primates in the African bush. Somehow the monkey or chimpanzee virus "jumped species" into black Africans to initiate the epidemic which has now killed 20 million people and infected 40 million more. How this sexually-transmitted virus came from black Africa to initially infect only young white gay men in Manhattan has never been explained satisfactorily. Furthermore, the epidemic in America erupted in the late 1970s, at a time when AIDS in Africa was unknown. The AIDS epidemic in Africa appeared in the autumn of 1982, at the earliest. The man-made origin of HIV/AIDS The man-made theory of AIDS is generally dismissed as "conspiracy theory." Nevertheless, AIDS researchers and writers like myself, Dr. Leonard G Horowitz, Dr. Robert Strecker, Professor Robert Lee, and others have proposed for two decades that HIV was seeded into gay men when they volunteered for the experimental hepatitis B vaccine experiment which took place in Manhattan, beginning in November 1978. Additional similar hepatitis B experiments using gay men as guinea pigs continued in other American cities until 1981 -the year the AIDS epidemic became official. Some of the cities included Los Angeles and San Francisco which, along with New York City, became the three big epicenters of the epidemic. My two books on the man-made origin of this disease: AIDS and the Doctors of Death [1988] , and Queer Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot [1993], provide documented evidence to support this theory. A Google internet search using the key words -man-made origin of AIDS-has 246,000 citations to various websites that explore this issue in detail. Despite all this, the man-made theory remains totally ignored by the scientific establishment and the major media. The origin of the new Kaposi's Sarcoma virus Like HIV, the new KS herpes virus-8 discovered in 1994 is considered to be yet another primate virus out of Africa with a suspected primate "viral ancestor" hiding in the African jungle. We are expected to believe that two primate viruses (a retrovirus and a herpes virus) jumped species in Africa at the same time -and ended up exclusively in the blood of white gay American men to produce a new immunodeficiency disease in 1979, now called AIDS. This proposed scenario suggests to me that such an unlikely African event has the markings of a scientific fairy tale, and I remain stupefied that such nonsense can pass for "science" in the twenty-first century. The origin of Kaposi's Sarcoma KS has a long history dating back to 1872 in Vienna, Austria, when dermatologist Moriz Kaposi described five patients with red-purple skin tumors. Before the AIDS outbreak, KS was a very rare disease affecting mainly elderly Jewish and Italian men. It was never considered a contagious or sexually-transmitted disease. In the 1960s, it was discovered that KS was a common skin cancer tumor in blacks in Central Africa, but the disease was never associated with the severe immunodeficiency characteristic of AIDS, nor was there any evidence that KS in Africa was sexually transmissible. KS was rarely, if ever, seen in African-Americans. As a dermatologist for over 30 years I never saw a KS case in a female; and KS in young men of any race or sexual persuasion was as rare as hen's teeth before the "introduction" of HIV. KS is a medical enigma. How did a previously rare disease like KS in America become a transmissible disease primarily affecting gay men? How did this herpes KS virus escape detection during the first 15 years of the AIDS epidemic? Why did the KS virus and HIV suddenly appear together in young gay men in 1979? Further complicating this picture is the discovery of small bacterial forms known as "mycoplasma", and the even more recent discovery of extremely tiny virus-like forms of bacteria called "nanobacteria", as well as my published reports of "cancer bacteria" as important etiologic agents in AIDS and KS. (For details, Google: "alan cantwell" + cancer bacteria.) All these newer bacterial agents are generally ignored by AIDS researchers, who focus exclusively on viruses. I believe some of the answers to questions surrounding the origin of HIV/AIDS can be found in the annual "Progress Reports" reports of the Virus Cancer Program and the Program's relationship to animal cancer research, genetic engineering of viruses, cancer vaccine research, and to covert biological warfare research. These hard-to-find annual Reports were published by the National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Bethesda, Maryland. The Virus Cancer Program (1968-1980) The Virus Cancer Program had it roots in 1964 when Congress provided funds to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for intensive research into the possible role of viruses in leukemia. In 1968 the Program, then titled the Special Virus-Cancer Program, was enlarged to encompass all types of cancer. On July 1, 1973 the Special Virus Cancer Program was renamed The Virus-Cancer Program (VCP) "to integrate the Program's research activities into the framework of the new National Cancer Plan." The Program combined the talents of many of the nation's finest virologists, biochemists, immunologists, molecular biologists, epidemiologists, and physicians, in an attempt to uncover the viral cause of cancer. Two classes of cancer-causing viruses were studied extensively: the RNA-type tumor "retroviruses" (like HIV) and the DNA herpes-type viruses (like the KS virus). The main goals were to collect various forms of cancer tissue and test them in animals; to identify animal and human cancer-causing viruses; to grow large amounts of "candidate human viruses" for testing purposes; and to develop vaccines against these cancer viruses. In essence, the scientists wanted to learn how to use viruses to make cancer - and to force "normal" cells to become cancerous by subjecting to viruses. I have studied the annual Virus Cancer Reports (VCP) covering the years 1971-1974 and 1976-1978. Each report is 300-400 pages, and the cumulative volumes refer to thousands of animal cancer virus and genetic engineering experiments. Biological warfare research, monkey research, and the VCP The annual VCP Reports must be studied with an awareness that the Program became wedded to secret military biological warfare research in the early 1970s. On October 18, 1971, as part of Richard Nixon's War on Cancer, the army's biowarfare research laboratory at Fort Detrick, Maryland, was permanently joined with the National Cancer Institute; and was re-titled . the Frederick Cancer Research Center. Litton Bionetics was named as the military's prime contractor. The primary task of the new Center was "the large scale production of oncogenic (cancer-causing) viruses and suspected oncogenic viruses to meet research needs on a continuing basis." Special attention was given to primate viruses (the alleged African source of HIV and the new KS virus)- and to the successful propagation of significant amounts of "human candidate viruses." Candidate viruses were defined as animal or human viruses that might cause human cancers. Later, the objective was to determine if such viruses could induce (either alone or with other co-carcinogens) human cancers (1977;58). Biowarfare scientists also had a keen interest in the role of human and non-human primate viruses as "helper viruses" in the production of cancer (1978;54). A steady supply of research animals (monkeys, chimpanzees, mice, cats, etc. ) was necessary; and multiple breeding colonies were established for the VCP. For example, a total of 2,274 primates from Africa and Asia were shipped to Litton for military use in 1971. Forcing cancer viruses into primates and other animals ------------------------------------------Short version: The $10 million funding for developing a biological weapon which would suppress the human immune system came through the 1970 Department of Defense Appropriations Bill. Read it here:http://www.ortiz-lopez.com/Hearings1A.htmlIt was developed in the labs at Fort Detrick, Maryland, and tested on the population of Zaire - who were told that they were getting the new smallpox vaccine by the World Health Organization and the Centers of Disease Control. (David Rockefeller)In 1979, ads were run in New York, San Francisco, and four other US cities looking for subjects to test the 'new Hepatitis B vaccine' on. They specifically asked for Black males, Hispanic males, promiscuous homosexual males, and intravenous drug users to be part of the test group. They were given AIDS.It's all about population reduction."The United Nation's goal is to reduce population selectively by encouraging abortion, forced sterilization, and control of human reproduction, and regards two-thirds of the human population as excess baggage, with 350,000 people to be eliminated per day."- Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier, Nov. 1991"It’s terrible to have to say this. World population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. This is so horrible to contemplate that we shouldn’t even say it. "- Jacques Cousteau, UNESCO Courier, Nov. 1994.

Ho hum, another rant.

traffic was bad. Had a meet with a #D animation studio chaps out to recruit some students. Thought would do the intros and get out. Was puzzled by the 50 buns parcel on my table, left by the maid earlier in the day.

I wanted to get home because its was my wife's mate's birthday, thought there would be party. got delayed and sfter 5 unanswered calls on my brick, I called back. Her lover threatens to leave my home. LOL. The meeting's main pitch was over, made the proper noises and left, and took a wrong turn. Made it back, to find that the buns are still there.

Wished him, he fixes a drink and I change into my usual and she and mah son leave to a fucking dargah. I and my sardonic smile wish them well. Comes back and he asks, " For whom did you pray?" The answer is swift and the realization later. " For your health". The silence was broken by my laugh, covering for her. Wonder now why I did that. He beams and I too, because, the game is swinging my way.

Life is beautiful.

The capacity to drink and punch out

Gawd, its funny, that I get garrulous about a few things in my life and also on cyberspace, after I have had a few, the capacity is endless.

to drink and post whatever. just discovered bloggers elsewhere they are the same.

welcome to the new dawn, its about time here, literally.

The 6 hour Orgasm

Then on a particular weekend when we reached her home she tells me her momma has gone visiting to some place nearby and that she would be back only Monday morning. Well, here I am with a young girl alone in her house and she asks for my smoke. I oblige and next thing we know we are kissing each other quite frantically and we are on the mattress which is on the floor. Its 2pm. My hands start straying and there are no restrictions.just lips glued to each other and tongues probing each other, while my hands are going all over.I reach her pussy and she is dripping wet and slide a finger in, then two, then three, then all my fingers upto the palm and am sticky wet and still thesmooch continues...(and it hits me then on the side that she is no virgin) I break off slide her skirt up and she lifts her legs straight up and removes her panty and I slide down with my mouth on her chest, now on her half revealed navel, now on to her coffee brown legs and finally on to the viscous pink mystery from which we all come death bound. I stick my mouth into her pussy, tongue frantically playing with her clitoris and drinking, slurping all her come in to myself. She kept coming and coming..We come up for air and I am asked to go down again and count the moles on her pussy; hidden amongst the bush are 7 little rascals shining with my saliva and her come.Its time for me to show mine and I let her do the research. She counts one. There were two I say..one was chopped off during the circumcision, without my permission!!!.Aand so it goes..I keep drinking in her come and before we know its 8pm and time for me to go. No making love no insertions except the tongue and its time for me to go..I couldn't believe it!!! And go I did. Met her again only on Monday and she behaves as if nothing happens..and during lunch she kept asking me with a straight face if I had, had enough water. I mean look at me..I had seen a pussy up close for the first time in my life, tasted it and still hadn't made love to it..God must be a sadist. The week just flew by and we are on to a Saturday. Its 2pm. And we are in my room. . So at the most we had 2.5 to 3 hrs to do what we had to do.The smooching starts the minute the door is closed and before I know it we are in our birthday suits and I am quenching my thirst again....this time the lady says politely lets make love. I agree, ready to lose my virginity; when we discover there are no condoms.

The tremors

Its been a week since I have been here, my home to say. Nothing has changed, except that I did vocalize my need to seperate, experimentally, with the shirt on my back and the 50k that I had paid for the home advance. Earlier in the day, she asked me if 50k was enough, with the eye of a dead fish. Her man was there, and it sure was funny. She dosnt know that it is. A life beyond the home comforts. An animal can be domesticated for a few and this one, me, has done his time.

I need to go. To let my seed grow.

Unhindered, without the angry intellect of mine. It could be contagious, the anger I mean.

But, like any other writer, one needs the love of a woman, not a cleft, mind you. And something tells me that, its not going to happen, through my life.

I dont like compromises, why should anyone? And so I sit here, punching maudling bullshit out, full of self pity and realizing that nothing is going to come out of my punchings. Gawd, I have forgotten how to write or to affix a signature on an instrument that's negotiable.

The BPO after effects are to be seen. They have shorn the social fabric of its foundings. everywhere you go, its fucking clefts, with the saccarine, dulcet voices. I hear them in the Coffee Day shops, the lunch places where these clefts work.

They exchange boyfriends, not notes and husbands too with a wink and a nod. The male homosapien has been overtaken and he hasnt realised that in his ego-filled mind and will not too, for quite sometime to come, till the day he really cognits that his role in the world, even today, isnt the pprovider as stated, but as a provider, of the seed, and nothing else.

Someday, this world will cry out for re-population. Remember me, then. I have enough to seed them back, idiots.

Arrival....and then the Awakening

Her colleague had gone to China for some biz meet or the other earlier in the week...He came home for one on the road before he left. Today, saturday was when he came back. Got me a bottle of a litre of bacardi white. she went to the airport to receive him. had been preparing me for her to go and receive him the moment he left. I said sure, the plan was exclusive,of me. Earlier in the evening when the car came, she stands at the doorstep asking me if I was sure that I wudnt come to the airport. I shrugged and asked her to go....

They come back...she looks beautiful, sunken cheeks filled out, a woman in love. Have seen that before in my life. He had a few drinks and left, showering gifts, before he did. I have a slug of the Bacardi and am aroused and even as he left, I indicated openly that the hip swaying, would be dealt with later after he goes.

God, its been long since I ate some pussy. I finish mah dinner, smoke and chew cloves, scented betel nuts and am raring to go., the lights in my room are on, the music tuned to the local FM station and in a whisper; the nights are loud here.

I go to her bedroom.

And the foreplay starts, her nipples are hard, which I know is good for the night to come and I move my hand down to the portal, the cleft to say. Her legs are jammed tight, and all the while her nips are hard. Finally, she sez she aint interested, and by this time I get to feel her pussy, even a desert wouldnt have been drier. Arid. Something in the back of my head tells me that theres something wrong, this being a crevice I had navigated before and its a niggle that wont go away.My hard is rock solid. I persist. Finally the word. I am 42. And all the while, she has been stringing me along. She gets her periods and the morning after pills are depleting steadily. I havent been to her bdedroom since 30 months.

Today was the first time, since. As a husband I think I am entitled to know, why them pills are depleting, regularly.

Fuck, I gotta log off and help myself to the old schoolboy method.

Will I ever get to eat dessert?
-----------
I woke up with a start, that niggle hitting me hard. Her pussy was clean shaven, not the usual trimmed bush. I keep the door to my bedroom firmly shut. The kitchen sounds are missing and I hit the various fora, post, read mail and hear her coming awake. The flush of the toilet, the hiss of the cooker. She has to go for a special show of a movie with her office crowd and she is making breakfast and lunch for me. My door remains frimly shut. Last night, the levee in my mind broke and am thinking about something which I should have done long ago. i am stilll toying with the idea when someone rings the bell, I get up to open the door, opening my rooms door. By this time she has opened and its a neighbour. She has a wan look and there is realization in her eyes, that last night a line was crossed and its never gonna be the same again. She will come back in the evening after picking up the son from her mother's place where he had gone for the week end.

I am alone.

SOUL READING

http://www.nomorefakenews.com/archives/archiveview.php?key=2813

SEPTEMBER 5, 2005. For the past six years, I have been doing readings for people. There is no good name for this process. People have called it soul reading. It is actually the reading of archetypes that exist in various non-continuum spaces. So far, on PREMIUM CONTENT, I have posted 36 recent articles about this process, and about the much misunderstood area of symbols and archetypes in general. Here is how it began. As a painter, I became interested in spontaneously inventing shapes that gave the impression of an unknown language. I found I could read these shapes. The reading was enormously energizing. After some intuitive trial and error, I connected each letter of the English alphabet to a shape. In this way, I could use the shape as a platform for translating the letter into hundreds, thousands of possible meanings. And in this fashion, I came into the realm of archetypes. A true archetype is a personage or an event that has, in its own way, a life. An archetype is there for one reason: to assist in the transformation and widening of consciousness. As an experiment, I took the name of a friend, and for each letter of that name, I read the shape, the symbol that went with it. I encountered many archetypes, and I gleaned massive amounts information from them. I put all this on tape. One thing led to another, and people asked for readings. In the process of doing readings, I became aware that, long before societies and civilizations started employing symbols as a way of narrowing and focusing the mind, as a way to control the individual adventuresome character of the mind, symbols were open-ended---and they were approached as objects of meditation and contemplation. This meditation was not passive. It was quite the opposite, and among the many things it did, it produced extraordinary energy. Energy the mind and body and imagination could use. This energy could also impact favorably on health. My readings were, after a fashion, a meditation on archetypes. The name of a person---and all the shapes that were connected to those letters---became my medium, just as oils are a medium for many painters. However, these shapes, these symbols, offered different meanings for different people. The shape connecting to an H in one person's name gave off a set of meanings that were different from the meanings that effused from the H in another person's name. In the same way, a painter uses red to express certain feelings and sensations in one context---but in another context, the red means something else. As I read these shapes and meditated on the archetypes, I began to see, quite lucidly, times and places and civilizations that existed beyond Earth, beyond this system of planets, beyond this Milky Way. In most cases, these civilizations were millions of years old. They connected to the experience of the person for whom I was doing a reading. I would find that this person, this soul, this psyche had lived lives in these far-flung places and times. Many lives. These lives were connected to some of the meanings of an archetype. These lives were illustrative of an archetype. Instead of choosing to pull back from these perceptions, I decided to push them to the hilt. Time after time, I saw civilizations that had headed into a decline after the use of symbols and archetypes had degenerated into strategies of control. Ironically, the very technologies that had provided a level of security and protection and comfort and survival also, in a direct manner, employed symbols in a drastically neutered style. To gain precision, the psyche was sacrificed on an altar of progress. And in the spiritual/religious realm, reductionism was the order of the day. Under the banner of consolidating the old and diverse gods, the new gods (symbols) were stripped of many poetic and suggestive qualities. On a not-very-deep esoteric level, this is the gist of the biblical Sampson story. Shorn of his uniqueness, he became powerless. Running counter to the grain of recent Earth history, it is proliferation, not reduction, that awakens the psyche. There is no possible new political order that, by boiling down the function of the State to some version of control, can offer anything useful. Decentralization of power along every channel is the answer, and it is the answer because it comes closer to the true desires of the soul, the psyche. What emerged from my readings was a deeper understanding of the staggering uniqueness of every individual. It also became apparent that every soul is engaged in a towering journey to access more consciousness, more creative power. It doesn't matter what the person is doing in this life. It doesn't matter how that looks. Behind it, there is the journey. What we take to be the basic myths of Earth culture are a drop in the bucket. They are essentially the shaving down (into lowest common denominators) of millions and millions of possible vectors. Exigency, crisis, threat, danger are the reasons that have been given, over the last 100,000 years or so, to postpone the re-vitalization of the full range of great journeys. The wise ones always tell us that we must do this and that and this and that and this and that NOW, and the rest will have to wait for later. Unseen below the level of these demands is the fact that, through the reduction of the individual psyche and its desires, there arose the very substance of every crisis and danger that has come down the pipeline. And every so-called heresy and so-called mental disorder stems, ultimately, from an attempt to falsely label and curtail the soul's ultimate journeys. As a reporter, I have spent more hours than I can count in exposing the control operations and cover stories and crimes and deceptions and mind-control strategies of planetary elites. I have run for public office. I've participated in numerous activist projects. I started a boycott of major chemical/drug/bio-engineering companies who poison populations. To act in these ways is a relevant and good thing. At the same time, there is a larger context, and no matter how we may play at ignoring it, it rings its own bell, and it has its own agenda. Which is our agenda. There is no death. There is no ceasing to exist. There is no end to basic life. There is no end to YOU. For those people for whom I've been privileged to do these readings of the psyche, I've seen the outward energy that dissolves matrixes and formulae and flimsy facades of the so-called known universe. When the greater journey swims into view and clarifies, the archetypes are there, with hands outstretched. They offer assistance in what the soul already wants. More life. More consciousness. More imagination. More power to manifest. More compassion. More enlightenment. These goals, properly seen and felt, outdistance Earth culture in a matter of seconds. That culture has never been equipped to go even a small part of the way. Having gained an appreciation of each individual's uniqueness (and it is far beyond anything I had imagined), I can say with assurance that no system will ever encompass it. No system now, no system in the future. What began as an attempt to read shapes and symbols escalated into a medium for working with that uniqueness. A medium, not a system. Only after I was in the middle of the process did I realize I had been after that for a very long time. No assessment of what we all suscribe to together, no study of consensus, no elucidation of cultures (consensus in action) ever carried any real weight with me. I found myself falling into a trance. I found myself in a swamp. I was working against myself. I was, in fact, perceiving the world through rather sophisticated categories. I didn't think I was, but I was. Now, the veil is being torn aside. And the relief is enormous. Symbols were once my lenses. Now they are doorways. Archetypes are fundamentally joyous. They say, "We know you have been trained, and you have trained youself, to see us as representatives of a few dried-up meanings. But we're of a different nature. Look at us with a thousand new eyes. Find in us an unlimited number of meanings, energies, byways and rocketing landscapes. Put away the old premise that such an activity will merely lead you around in a circle to a subjective impasse. Don't you see? It's just the reverse. Isn't this, when you strip away the conditioned illusions, exactly what you have been waiting for? Isn't this where you really want to go? Haven't you always suspected insight and knowledge and oceans of energy lay along this path?" Yes. And my ship has left the dock.

SOME NOTES ON NEW ORLEANS

http://www.nomorefakenews.com/archives/archiveview.php?key=2822

SEPTEMBER 7, 2005. As a number of people have pointed out for years, when you "solve" a tragedy by giving the government more power and money to do better the next time, you are usually whistling in the dark. The entire collaboration between government and big medicine speaks of such madness. Every human behavior and "symptom" is chopped up into a new disease name, and toxic drugs inevitably follow. Whereas, on a level playing field, without government welfare for NIH and other major med institutions, America would be in far better health. Mike Ruppert (From the Wildnerness) has an article about the dangers of feeding more $$ and power into the FEMA machine to handle "the next Katrina." That way lies: further corruption, less freedom, and no solution. If FEMA is geared to do anything that verges on sanity, it's about forming contingency plans to deal with disasters. We can see how well that's been working in New Orleans. I have a number of eye-witness reports that state looting and crime exist at a far lower level than has been suggested in the press. If so, then of course these press articles serve to explain/justify why rescue efforts have been too little and too late. "We couldn't get in there. People would shoot at us." I just got back from a trip. I observed that most people are in a semi-dazed shock at the destruction of a major American city. They can't really believe that something like this could happen in this day and age. We're supposed to be, with all our vaunted technology/communication/organization, beyond it. People of every political stripe assume "the government will take care of us." But the government isn't saving New Orleans. In fact, as everyone now knows, federal funds for the improvement of those now-famous levees were cut. For the last several decades, it's been an open secret that a number of factors have been conspiring to set New Orleans up for exactly what has just happened: the destruction of all-important tree cover to protect the city against a direct hurricane hit; the mangling and shredding of the surrounding wetlands by thousands of miles of dug channels laid in by oil companies; New Orleans' position below sea level; the inability of the levees to deal with massive rains and wind; the strategic bottling up of the Mississippi River. A Katrina has been predicted by scores of people. It appears that there is at least one decent model for averting this horrendous tragedy: Holland. In the 1950s, that nation was flooded in many sectors. Its position vis-a-vis the level of the surrounding seas was a key. So Holland successfully instituted a plan to keep a disaster from reoccurring. The bland and impotent and leaderless position of the White House has driven home the fact that this administration lives its sealed-off life at a different level from what the rest of us would call human. Statements from federal officials have taken a vile tone: "We knew there could be some flooding, but the failure of the levees was a total shock." Serenely delivered bullshit. I often make pharmaceutical analogies, and here is yet another occasion for doing it. When you stop and add up the overall toxic effects of thousands of medical drugs, you are faced with a choice. You can say the millions of deaths and maimings caused by these drugs is the result of serial blundering by well-intentioned people, or you can go to another place and view, at the very least, a crime of depraved indifference---negligent homicide. You can go beyond that, because who benefits when a population is rendered unable to think or function or react in a normal fashion, as more and more people are poisoned? New Orleans, in all respects, has been sitting there without protection, a perfect target for a storm like Katrina. It's too easy to call this serial blundering. And images of armed troops now moving through the city add up to the idea that help is really all about restoring order, not saving lives. Conditioning the American population to martial law is a goal of the government and those men who, in the shadows, stand behind the known government. All the lunatic hoopla, for example, about the coming "pandemic flu" has the same purpose. Ditto for the so-called war on terrorism. To save democracy, we must destroy it. What better way to drive this point home than to allow a whole city to disappear? George Bush is the perfect puppet for this current "quickening." In all respects, he is a man who has been foreshortened in perspective by a desperate effort to assert his position as a legitimate member of a royal American family. The approaching end-times, the mission of saving the world from evil forces ranged against the messiah, the sword-wielding crusader against the heathens, the closed-out consciousness that builds walls against admitting mistakes, the sloganeering posing as intelligence...it all feeds into the maw of reducing the kind of freedom in which he, Bush, would sink like a stone. Unrecognized, unappreciated, unsung. And a very large part of the American population, bent on claiming "true values" as its territory, has bought into the premise that those values are quick phrases engraved on blood-soaked pieces of cloth framed behind glass, hanging on walls in living rooms and kitchens. The so-called liberals are no better. They have their own slogans and shallow banners. They, in fact, are the standard bearers for setting up the nation as a virtual hospital, in which every citizen will be treated with kindness by doctors who know that every move we make, every breath we take, is a symptom of a disease that must be alleviated. Both sides of the aisle are fronting for a vicious cartoon, Mickey Mouse bleeding out of both ears. This is what happens when the thread of a real life and its dimensions are lost, when the wellsprings of the soul are replaced by a desert of pure nothing. As one tragedy after another is engineered, we can postpone, under the rubric of emergency, this need for regeneration at the core of what we truly are. We can do that, but the returns will diminish, the price will escalate.

ANOTHER COMPLETE LOAD OF CRAP FROM THE CDC

http://www.nomorefakenews.com/archives/archiveview.php?key=2139

SEPTEMBER 5, REPRINTED FROM AUGUST 25, 2004. AP is reporting on massive preparations for a global flu pandemic. Huh? Based on what? SARS? Which involved, what, 1000 cases world-wide, none of which were proven to be anything more than traditional lung infections plus rampant diarrhea at the Amoy Gardens apartment complex in Hong Kong---where the toilet pipes were leaking and spreading fecal matter. COME ON. But when you read the AP piece below, you'll see, of course, that the real issue is obtaining KONTROL over populations and viciously curtailing basic rights like assembly and free speech. MEDICAL MARTIAL LAW. I predicted it in 1988. This is the drip method----fear whipped up here and there over West Nile and avian flu and SARS and so on...at each step of the way conditioning the populace to accept mandated drugs and vaccines and quarantines and government force, if necessary---you know, TO PROTECT US ALL. The CDC is working their PR angles at the moment. We can soon expect WHO to chirp in and offer their sober analysis. This is operant conditioning, and it has nothing to do with germs. NOTHING. There is no global flu threat. THERE IS NO GLOBAL FLU THREAT. It's all bullshit of the purest ray serene. You can count on one thing. Whatever drugs they use, whatever they spray to kill the birds or the mosquitoes or the flying fish, it'll be toxic. It'll CAUSE some of the symptoms they claim are PART OF THE DISEASE. Here's the AP piece. My comments are in caps and brackets. U.S. Prepares for Possible Flu OutbreakClosing Schools, Rationing Medicine May Be Needed if New Flu Strain Sparks Outbreak, U.S. Says The Associated Press [NOTICE THE NICE TOUCH THERE WITH THE SCHOOLS---STAY HOME, KEEP THE LITTLE KIDDIES INDOORS AWAY FROM THE GERMS---EMERGENCY...ALL SCHOOLS CLOSED...] WASHINGTON Aug. 25, 2004 — Closing schools, restricting travel and rationing scarce medications may be the nation's first protections if a powerful new flu strain spurs a worldwide outbreak because it will take months to brew a vaccine, say government preparations for the next pandemic. Specialists say it's only a matter of time before the next one strikes, and concern is rising that the recurring bird flu in Asia could be the trigger if it mutates in a way that lets it spread easily among people. [ONLY A MATTER OF TIME...LIKE THE SUN BURNING OUT...SO LET'S LAY ON TRAVEL BANS...] There have been three flu pandemics in the last century, the worst in 1918, which killed more than half a million Americans and 20 million people worldwide.It's impossible to predict the toll of the next one. But estimates suggest a bad one could kill up to 207,000 Americans, says the nation's new response plan, obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press. [NEW RESPONSE PLAN---LET'S TELL EVERYONE THE SKY COULD FALL AND GO UP TO THE HILL FOR MORE MONEY] That's almost six times more lives than regular flu claims every year. Millions of sick patients could swarm doctors' offices and hospitals, and the country could suffer an economic and social wallop from disruption of transportation, commerce, even routine public safety. [MILLIONS OF SICK PATIENTS SWARMING OFFICES---PAINT THOSE PICTURES, BABY] [PUBLIC SAFETY COULD DISINTEGRATE---CALL OUT THE TROOPS] The Pandemic Influenza Response and Preparedness Plan, to be released Thursday by the Department of Health and Human Services, stresses ways to speed up vaccine production, limit the spread of such a super-flu, and care for the ill.It's just a first draft, open for public comment through October as the government struggles to decide exactly how to respond to the earliest signs of a pandemic. [THE ACRONYM FOR THE PLAN IS PIRRP---as in perp---PERFECT] [WHIP UP SUDDEN NEED FOR MORE VACCINES---DRUG COMPANY PAYOFFS] [EARLIEST SIGNS OF PANDEMIC---THREE PEOPLE SNIFFLING IN DES MOINES] "We recognize that we need more treatments and we need more vaccine capability," Dr. Julie Gerberding, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said in an interview."But it's also important to remember good, old-fashioned isolation and quarantine have a special role to play in any pandemic," she said. [LOVE THAT GOOD OLD QUARANTINE---I REMEMBER IT LIKE COCA COLA ON A HOT SUMMER DAY WHEN I WAS A KID---WE ALL RECALL GOOD OLD QUARANTINE, DON'T WE? NO?] "One of the things we have to do now, before we're in the middle of this situation, is do our very best to make sure people understand what would be the first steps, why they'd be necessary, and what they can do to minimize the disruption." [ACHTUNG...GIVE OUT ORDERS TO THE SHEEP] Among the preparations:The CDC is increasing surveillance so it can spot dangerous flu strains as soon as they emerge anywhere in the world, offering early warnings.It now takes six to eight months to develop a new vaccine against the slightly different flu strains that circulate every winter. A pandemic strain would be genetically very different. Government scientists plan to create "seed viruses" as potential vaccine candidates in hopes of speeding production. And HHS is working with manufacturers to ensure fast access to supplies including the chicken eggs that flu vaccine is grown in so production could start at a moment's notice. [CREATE LOTS OF VIRUSES---RUB THEM ALL OVER YOUR BODY] Four drugs can treat the flu if given soon after symptoms begin, and decrease chances of catching it. U.S. supplies of the two considered top pandemic candidates, Tamiflu and Relenza, are limited, but HHS began stockpiling some Tamiflu last year. [GOOGLE THESE DRUG NAMES AND SEARCH FOR THE ADVERSE EFFECTS---ALSO SEE SPRINKLED COMMENTS THAT THERE ARE NO USEFUL DRUGS FOR VIRUSES] HHS is increasing pressure on states to prepare their own plans for dealing with pandemic flu this year, including how to free up enough hospital beds to handle the sickest patients. Last year, only about a quarter of state health departments had such plans. [KICK OUT THE ELDERLY PATIENTS] Travel restrictions like those implemented during last year's SARS crisis in Asia and Canada, closing schools and restricting public gatherings, even quarantine may be necessary to limit the spread of infection, depending on where a pandemic begins and how virulent it seems.The government is seeking input from hospitals and state health departments as it develops the plans.Indeed, HHS is asking some big questions, such as whether the federal government should control all supplies of a pandemic flu vaccine to ensure the people who need it most get it. [OF COURSE THE FEDS WANT TO CONTROL ALL THE VACCINES] Recent shortages of regular flu vaccine led to price hikes and other practices that limited access by the elderly and other particularly at-risk patients.Similarly, the government is considering rationing anti-flu drugs before a vaccine is produced, debating if doctors, nurses, police and other groups should get first doses along with the most frail patients. [YEAH, THIS WILL BE THE KERNEL OF THE "DEBATE"---WHO SHOULD GET THE VACCINES---COVER STORY, DIVERSION---CREATE THE IDEA OF DRUG AND VACCINE SCARCITY AND PEOPLE WILL KILL EACH OTHER TO GET THEM---"IT'S SCARCE? I WANT IT."] end of AP article It's a love fest. Climb on the bandwagon, blow your horns, the medical armies are coming. The dream team. Addendum. In the AP piece, it is stated that the wire service OBTAINED a copy of the soon-to-be-released government preparedness report. The implication is, there was some actual work involved in getting that report. Perhaps it was leaked. Nothing could be further from the truth. The CDC/HHS WANTS the advance pub. They sought it out. They're promoting their little asses off. This is a PR push. Perhaps it happened this way: AP: Hello? CDC: Mike, this is Tim at the CDC. AP: Hey. CDC: We've got this very hot report on a global flu pandemic and we want to get a story on it. AP: (yawning) Yeah? Can you email it over? CDC: It's long. AP: Attachments, dude. CDC: Sure. Or we'll send it by courier. Have it there in an hour. AP: Okay. CDC: Flu bugs. The big one. AP: Again? CDC: No, this time it's for real. Maybe. AP: Is that definite? CDC: 8 on a scale of 1 to 10. AP: You're on the record? CDC: No. AP: Okay. (the reporter dozes off and wakes with a jerk) CDC: Talking closing of schools in the fall. AP: Sounds good. CDC: Travel bans in the US. AP: Will I be able to fly to Boston to see my ex? CDC: Don't count on it. AP: If there's anything you can do to ground all flights to Boston, I'll owe you. CDC: Who knows, the election might be postponed. AP: Listen, you guys have anything for hemorrhoids over there? CDC: We're doing some studies on replacement with a plastic anus. AP: Really. CDC: Yeah. Thing is, it eliminates the sphincter response. AP: The plastic thing is open all the time? CDC: There's a lid. It opens and closes with a remote. AP: Who has the remote? CDC: You do. AP: What about orgasms? Isn't the sphincter involved in that? CDC: A few male patients, in the preliminary studies, experienced a minor amount of semen coming out of their ears. AP: Was it pleasurable? CDC: One of our people is from India. He likened it to a kundalini response. AP: Is that good? CDC: If you're a monk in a cave.

CENTURY OF THE BRAIN

http://www.nomorefakenews.com/archives/archiveview.php?key=2460

SEPTEMBER 4, 2005, REPRINTED FROM MARCH 2, 2005. The Forbes article below describes a small pilot study of depressed patients, and electrodes implanted in their brains as treatment. When I began this site, I wrote about the upcoming century (21st) of the brain, and how researchers were moving into place to assault that organ and manipulate it to "achieve cures" for various conditions. From the top of the medical cartel, however, such research is truly aimed at CONTROL. The cover story is treatment. With far-ranging data gathered from many compartmentalized sources, an effort to control human thought and life can proceed without naked public revelations. It is significant that depression is now an accepted territory for direct brain tinkering, mangling, and manipulation. Through an intense and sustained PR effort, various medical/psychiatric groups have pronounced depression a widespread disorder affecting all age groups. Therefore, electrode insertion and subsequent electrical currents sent into the brain automatically become mainstream. Notice, as you read the Forbes piece, that standard electroshock treatment (which is actually nothing more and nothing less than torture) is cited casually as one of those treatments for depression which is undertaken when the patient does not improve on drugs---and then, if both drugs and shock fail, this new electrode procedure is a backup modality. So we have a further PR strategy: place electroshock (controversial, even within the psychiatric profession) into the normal lineup of depression treatments, and then extend the lineup with this newer electrode insertion. It's called sleight-of-hand and diversion. The magician gets you to keep your eyes on a card (electrode insertion) while he slips another card (shock therapy) into the deck in his other hand. Also notice in the Forbes piece that one researcher uses the metaphor of a "terrorist" to describe a section of the brain thought to be instrumental in causing depression. The goal becomes to neutralize the terrorist. The global war on terrorism is extended to the brain itself. As the years pass, we will surely see this metaphor repeated. Implanted Electrodes Combat Depression By Amanda Gardner HealthDay Reporter TUESDAY, March 1 (HealthDay News) -- A procedure that involves drilling two holes into a person's skull and then implanting electrodes in the brain has shown promise in treating individuals who are severely depressed and resistant to other types of treatment. Four of six patients who received this deep brain stimulation showed sustained improvement six months after the procedure took place, scientists report in the March 3 issue of Neuron. The patients have now been followed for a year and are still in remission, added co-lead investigator Dr. Andres Lozano, a professor of neurosurgery at the University of Toronto. Although deep brain stimulation to other parts of the brain has been used to treat epilepsy, Parkinson's and other diseases, this appears to be the first time it has been used to treat major depression, Lozano said. About 20 percent of people with depression fail to respond to standard treatments. Some of these people will respond to combinations of medications plus electroconvulsive therapy, sometimes known as shock therapy. A remaining few, however, still do not get better. The new therapy is far more refined than electroconvulsive therapy, Lozano said. "Electroconvulsive therapy is analogous to rebooting your computer," he explained. "This [deep brain stimulation] is very pinpointed, precise therapy, involving a very precise area of brain that plays a key role in depression." For the past four or five years, there have been hints that this area of the brain, the subgenual cingulate region, or Cg25 region, played a role in depression. "When people are acutely sad, this area of the brain becomes active," Lozano said. "If you take antidepressants, the activity in this area goes down." This information led to the hypothesis that diminishing activity in that area might improve depression. "It was as if the thermostat was set for 120 degrees and you want it to be 70 degrees," Lozano explained. "This area of the brain is running in overdrive, and it is causing depression and also interfering with the function of areas of the brain that are involved in cognitive function." The new study involved six patients, median age 46, who had failed to respond to a minimum of four other treatments for depression, including medications, psychotherapy and/or electroconvulsive therapy. The participants were recruited from across Ontario and the deep brain stimulation procedures were performed at Toronto Western Hospital, which is affiliated with the University of Toronto. The researchers first pinpointed the precise area of the brain in question using positron emission tomography (PET) scans. Then Lozano drilled two small holes into each side of the skull in a two-hour procedure that took place under local anesthesia. He inserted two thin wires with electrode contacts, then tunneled the wires (about the diameter of uncooked spaghetti) underneath the skin behind the ear down to the chest. An incision was made under the collarbone so a battery could be placed there. The electrodes were hooked up to the batteries (one on each side of the body). The batteries can be programmed remotely through the skin, and there is no restriction on activities, Lozano said. The batteries last for five years. Stimulation, which is adjusted individually for each patient, takes place 24 hours a day. "We think it's going to require ongoing stimulation," said Lozano. When stimulation was turned off in one participant, the depression returned within two weeks. In all, Lozano and his co-authors saw a "striking benefit" in four of the six patients. The other two were removed from the study after six months because they failed to improve. It's not clear why four patients improved, while the other two did not, although the individuals who did improve all had depression that began in their late teens and early 20s. "It's one spot of the brain that is really acting as a terrorist and subjugating very widespread areas of the brain and interfering with their function," Lozano said. "If one can seek out this area and tell it to behave in a more normal fashion, then the rest of the brain follows." The four people also showed improvements in concentration and motivation, he said. Lozano stressed that this research was "early, early" and that additional studies needed to be performed. "We don't know if this will be reproducible and sustained," he said. Researchers also don't know if the results can be generalized to all depression. "It's only six people, so it's nothing to be too excited about, yet these patients really are the most refractory, and many of them had not been out of the house for several years," Lozano said. "Now they're talking about going to work, going to the gym, starting a business. It's really been a transformative experience for some of them." end Forbes article

INTERVIEW WITH A FATHER AFTER THE DEATH OF HIS DAUGHTER

http://www.nomorefakenews.com/archives/archiveview.php?key=2648

SEPTEMBER 3, 2005, REPRINTED FROM MAY 28, 2005. He is in his late forties. He lives in the Western US. Several years ago, his teen-aged daughter committed suicide a week after beginning a course of treatment with one of the SSRI antidepressants. This father states, "For now, I'm keeping back my name and the name of the drug my daughter took, because I'm in the process of getting together a lawsuit against the drug's manufacturer. I can tell you that it is one of the popular drugs---Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft." Q: What happened to your daughter? A: She was a very happy child, but she had a few problems come up. One of her friends at school died in an accident. And her grades slipped after that. She was sad. My wife and I talked with her, and she said she'd put things right. She'd get back to work in her courses. A school counselor told us he thought she should see a psychiatrist for help. Q: Is that what you did? A: Yes. We were naive. We thought this meant a short period of therapy. Conversation. But after two sessions, the psychistrist told us she was suffering from depression. Q: Did you accept the diagnosis? A: Yes. We misunderstood. We thought the psychistrist meant she was sad. Which she was. But this was a clinical assessment, and the doctor told us she should be on an antidepressant. We asked him for how long, and he said he would be monitoring the situation. We went along with that. Q: Did your daughter feel she should be on the drug? A: She wasn't sure, but she went along with it. Some of her friends were taking antidepressants. Q: What happened? A: On a weekend, she began to take the pills. Right away, we knew something was wrong. She seemed sedated at first. For a few hours on Saturday, she dragged herself around the house. Her eyes looked glazed. Then, by the end of the day, she was very up. Too up. She was in her room on the phone laughing and screaming. It's not something she usually does. It was out of character for her. Q: Did you do anything? A: We called the doctor. It took us a couple of hours to get through to him because he was out of the office. He told us to give her just half the dose from then on. Q: So you did that? A: Yes. And by Sunday afternoon, she seemed all right. She was her normal self, more or less. She went out to a touch football game, and then she came home with a friend. They sat on the porch and talked. But that night, she had a nightmare. I found her about 2 in the morning in the kitchen, making herself a sandwich. She told me about the dream. It was very vivid. She said it wasn't like other nightmares. I calmed her down. She took a shower, put on her pajamas, and came back into the kitchen. We talked about school for awhile, and then she went back to bed. The next day she went off to school. My wife works, so neither of us saw her again until early that night. She was sitting on the living room floor with a lot of old Christmas cards spread out there. She was looking at the pictures on the cards and reading the notes inside. She said to my wife, "Why is everybody so excited about Christmas?" We thought that was an odd remark, because there she was with all the old cards, looking at them. She seemed a bit distracted. I asked her why she was looking at the cards, and she said, "I'm just thinking about all the people." She said she needed to be more sympathetic to people. She stood up and said, "That's my problem. I'm not sympathetic enough." I went into our bedroom and called the psychiatrist. Again, it took me a while to get through to him. He said nothing was wrong, just to keep her on the half-dose. I explained that she was acting out of character, and he said it was all right, she was just going through something. That night, the three of us [father, mother, daughter] were at home. We sat in the living room and talked. My daughter said several things that seemed strange. Out of context or out of character. She talked about next spring, and the flowers coming back into bloom. She said she wanted to plant lots of flowers in the beds at the front of the house. Before this, she had never taken an interest in flowers or gardening. She said that flowers were "messengers." The next day, I stayed home from work and I kept my daughter out of school. I wanted to be with her. I suspected the drug was causing her to act out of character. I didn't like it. It made me nervous. It seemed that she was high and slightly out of control. This was Tuesday. She wanted to go to school---but then she changed her mind, and she became engaged by the idea that everybody should take down all the signs on billboards around town. She said they were a blight on the landscape. She told me she was going to start a committee at school and urge parents to join in. Q: To take down the billboards. A: Yes. For her, this was way out of character. She had never shown any interest in this sort of thing. But it was more than that. She had this messianic look in her eye. She was suddenly on a mission. By the middle of the afternoon, she'd forgetten about the whole thing and was in her room studying. At one point, she came out and told me she could concentrate very well, better than she'd ever been able to before. She was moving right through her homework. Then she had a snack and went back [to her room.] An hour later, I knocked on her door. There was no answer. I went in and she was asleep under the covers. I stood there for a few minutes and watched her. Her arm started twitching, and her face took on a look. She was grimacing. I sat by her bed for about half an hour. She calmed down. The twitching stopped. So I went out, left the door open, and called my wife at work. We talked for a few minutes. We were worried. I went into the bathroom and took the medicine bottle out of the cabinet. I counted out the pills. I knew how many were in the bottle to begin with. I wanted to make sure she was taking the right amount. Q: Was she? A: Yes. When she woke up, she seemed fine. The rest of the day everything was all right. On Wednesday, I took her to school. She came home at about four that afternoon. My wife was there. She'd come home early from work to check up on her. Everything seemed pretty normal. Q: Normal? A: She was not feeling sad. She wasn't high, she wasn't sad. She wasn't doing anything strange. She was okay. But again, that night, I found her, late, in the kitchen. She'd had another nightmare. She was sweating. She was upset. I told her we were going to go to the doctor the next day. That was her next appointment. We'd get it all straightened out. Q: Did you tell her you thought she was having a reaction to the drug? A: Yes, and she understood. She realized that the drug could be causing her nightmares. So the following day, she and I and my wife all went to the doctor's office. I had her tell the doctor everything that had been happening to her. He took notes. He said that the drug could be causing these reactions. He said, though, that with the half-dose, it would smooth out. We should give it another week, and if there were still problems, he might cut the dose further or switch her to another drug. I asked him if the half-dose she was currently taking was average for a girl her age and weight. He said that the full dose was completely proper for her, and the half-dose was "cautious." We felt reassured. My daughter said she didn't want to have any more of those nightmares, and the doctor told her they would probably go away very soon. The next day, everything was okay, and that night she slept through without any problems. My wife dropped her off at school. That was the last time we saw her alive. Q: What happened? A: I'm not going to go into details, because...it has to do with the suit. All I can tell you is, she committed suicide. My wife and I---our lives have never been the same. We have had our girl torn away from us, and there is nothing we can do. She's gone. We're still here, but it'll never be the same. I don't want to talk about this anymore. I just want people to know they should never trust these drugs or the doctors who prescribe them. I don't care how sane it sounds. Don't trust them.

The Medical Racket

Disclaimer: I am a layman, and do not give medical advice. Please do not take my word, or anybody else's, regarding your health. Take responsibility for your health, and do not give it to "experts" or anybody else. Your life is your life, and giving the responsibility for your health to others is a dangerous path. Talk to your doctor, read this essay, research the areas presented here if you feel inclined, but in the end, please make your own decisions. Doctors only know what they are taught, and if they are taught incorrectly, their advice can be less than helpful, and their treatments can kill you. Please do nothing simply because an "expert" or other authority figure tells you to.

Timeline

This essay is overflowing with names, dates and events, and takes an iconoclastic look at today’s medical establishment and how it came to be, while also arguing that legitimate alternative paradigms exist, and far preferable to today’s. Early readers informed me that it could be an overwhelming amount of information to digest, as well as emotionally trying. This timeline is designed to make the reading experience easier, so readers can refer to names, dates and events in the larger scheme of this essay. The early human data is controversial in many quarters, and this timeline hews more toward today’s orthodox theories. The early population estimates, until the modern age, are probably within 25% of the actual population, at least as far as orthodoxy is concerned. The timeline is broken into two pieces, to 1491, directly below, and from 1492 onward. There are far more links to this medical essay from the 1492 onward piece. This timeline is an abbreviated version of the site timeline.
=================
I can reproduce the whole site here, except that it would take a lot of time, but would do it someday, later. Follow the link on a week end and find for yourself how you have been ripped off. Theres more from another site which I will do now, in a moment.

===================================================
http://www.nomorefakenews.com/archives/archiveview.php?key=1681
AUGUST 10, 2005. Here is another backgrounder for my upcoming tele-workshop, DISEASE HOAXES AND HEALING EXERCISES. Click on the link below the green and blue painting on this page.

***************************************************************

MURDER AT THE US NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (NCI).

Daniel Haley's brilliant book, Politics in Healing, recounts how NCI's 1991 clinical trial of the innovative and "alternative" cancer medicine, hydrazine sulfate (HS), was rigged.

Rigged to fail.

A spectacularly promising medicine, HS had shown good results in trials at Harbor/UCLA hospital and in Russia. NCI felt obligated to test the drug. But there was a catch.

The drug's discoverer, Dr. Joseph Gold, had found that HS reacted badly if patients were taking other drugs, especially tranquilizers. Several warnings were given to NCI before it began its test. The warnings were explicit. Patients could DIE if they were taking tranquilizers.

It turned out that none of the NCI patients were warned about this. It turned out that 94% of those patients were in fact on tranquilizers.

Barry Tice, an investigator for the US General Accounting Office (GAO), looked into the NCI trial of hydrazine sulfate after it was over. He called Dr. Gold and told him he had found a "smoking gun." There was an internal NCI memo which
showed that NCI was well aware of the problems involved in the drug combinations.

The GAO did not back up its own investigator. The final GAO report on the NCI clinical trials of hydrazine sulfate simply accused NCI of sloppy bookkeeping.

In the June 1995 issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology, a letter from the NCI was published. The letter stated that NCI had omitted mentioning, in its own published account of its cancer study, that 94% of the patients had been on tranquilizers. But, because this letter did NOT mention how dangerous that situation was, it looked like NCI was simply admitting to a technical and unimportant mistake. A clerical error.

So what did happen to the patients in the NCI hydrazine sulfate study?

They ALL DIED.

The drug, hydrazine sulfate, was judged to be totally ineffective, and thus a competitor for chemotherapy dollars was eliminated. Hydrazine sulfate is a cheap, widely available, unpatentable substance. No profit there.

Was this story splashed across the front pages of major newspapers in America? Did the "great men" of television, those holy anchors, insist on covering it with the emphasis it deserved? Of course not.

The story was originally dug out and published in Penthouse, by reporter Jeff Kamen, who should have won a Pulitzer for it, but won nothing.

And NCI has a rule that none of its patients in clinical trials can have their names revealed.

(THERE ARE OTHER SUBSTANCES AND FOODS WHICH ARE INCOMPATIBLE WITH HYDRAZINE SULFATE AND MAY CAUSE GREAT HARM AND DEATH. ONE SHOULD KNOW ALL ABOUT THIS BEFORE DECIDING TO EXPERIMENT WITH THE DRUG.)

There is more to this incredible story. Penthouse publisher Bob Guccione's wife, Kathy Keeton, who was the founder of Longevity, a magazine that was part of the Guccione empire, was diagnosed with "galloping breast cancer" in 1995. She was given 6 weeks to live.

She refused chemotherapy and became a VERY high-profile case of a person taking hydrazine sulfate instead.

She also chose radiation to reduce one of her many tumors--a growth around her bile duct. Dr. Gold said the dose of radiation should be small, because hydrazine sulfate would enhance the effect of the radiation. But the radiologist gave her the full dose instead, burned her liver and caused later scarring.

Overall, Keeton recovered. In fact, a year after her predicted death date, her cancer was in full remission. The hydrazine sulfate was a remarkable success.

Guccione ran ads in Penthouse, asking for families of the dead victims in the NCI experiment to come forward and join a class-action suit against NCI.

Guccione estimated there had been 600 victims in the NCI clinical test.

In October 1997, Kathy Keeton went into a major and well-respected NY hospital for surgery. From all accounts, this operation had nothing to do with cancer. Amazingly, complications occurred. She died.

Most of America assumed she had succumbed to cancer. Further "proof" that hydrazine sulfate did not work.

Predictably, the FDA has gotten into the act. On April 23, 1998, that criminal agency raided a distributor of hydrazine sulfate, Great Lakes Metabolics, in Rochester, Minnesota. In 2000, the FDA shut down the company that supplies hydrazine sulfate to Great Lakes, and Great Lakes went out of business.

In 1996, when hydrazine sulfate (HS) was still very much in the public spotlight, Dr. Gold states he received 20 phone calls in one day from doctors at Sloan Kettering, the world's number one center for toxic chemotherapy research and treatment. These doctors wanted to obtain HS on the sly for their patients. Gold states that roughly 2/3 of the patients were from the doctors' families. And six of these doctors had refused to give HS to other patients at Sloan Kettering. The phrase, scum of the Earth, comes to mind.

Author Haley offers a dozen patient testimonials re HS. They are anecdotes, to be sure, but they are remarkable.

Example: "Oncologist report in today. No cancer anywhere, after two and a half months on HS and vitamins/minerals and supplements. They have no idea where cancer went."

Example: "Seven weeks on hydrazine sulfate. Brain and lung lesions disappeared."

Example: "I purchased some HS for my sister a few weeks ago. Too early to tell, but she went from near death at the hospital on chemo to a campground some place, with a fishing pole."

I don't make recommendations for medicines. HS studies at Harbor/UCLA and in Russia did not cure everyone, not by a long shot. Of course, there are questions about those protocols too, because ordinary foods like raisins are incompatible with HS--and who knows what the patients were fed. And, on top of that, no well-designed studies have ever been done using HS on patients in early stages of cancer, where the results might be even better.

HS has been defamed by monsters. "First do no harm" has been turned into "destroy." Those responsible for this terrible crime should be arrested, shackled, and shown on national television on the steps at NCI. NCI should be closed and fumigated.

More notes on HS (hydrazine sulfate)...

One session of conventional chemo costs enough to pay for 10 years of treatment with HS.

In 1973, a doctor with a terminal Hodgkins patient approached Dr. Gold for help. Gold recommended a dosage level. In a few weeks, the patient was up and around, not dead. By October of 1973, 1000 patients in the US were on HS.

Dean Burke, head of cell chemistry at NCI, said in 1974 that HS was "the most remarkable anticancer agent I have come across in my 45 years experience in cancer...this material is so cheap because it is made by the trainload for industrial purposes."

In September 1973, Sloan Kettering (SK), the most prestigious cancer center in the world, started an HS study on terminal patients. The lead physician, Dr. Manuel Ochoa, had agreed to give each patient 60 mg a day for 3 days and then 60 mg 3 times a day after that---but Dr. Gold learned Ochoa was changing the protocol drastically---he was giving 1 mg the first day, then 2 mg the next day, and so on, building up to a top of 30 mg----except in some cases he actually gave patients 120-190 mg a day---brutal overdoses.

In 1975 SK announced HS was worthless.

Dr. Gold then did a study for Calbiochem, a drug company. 70% of 84 patients gained weight and had less pain. HS was, in fact, designed to alleviate wasting away in the first place. 17% of the patients showed tumor regression or a stabilization of their condition for one year.

In 1975, Russian researchers published two positive study findings on HS.

In 1976, the American Cancer Society (ACS) put HS on its dreaded blacklist of "unapproved" cancer treatments. ACS neglected to mention it owned 50% of a competing and highly toxic cancer drug, 5FU.

By 1978, the FDA was cracking down on HS. 5000 patients in the US were on the medicine. The FDA falsely stated that HS caused bone marrow toxicity. In fact, conventional chemo---approved by the FDA---destroys bone marrow.

Jeff Kamen, the reporter who got the HS story out in Penthouse? Here is how he became interested in the first place. His mother Erna came back from cancer with HS. She gained 23 pounds and was doing much better. Then her doctor convinced her to stop HS and go on an experimental chemo drug. In five days, she was dead.

JON RAPPOPORT www.nomorefakenews.com

=====================================
http://www.nomorefakenews.com/archives/archiveview.php?key=2780

AUGUST 15, 2005. Here is another backgrounder for my upcoming telephone workshop, DISEASE HOAXES AND HEALING EXERCISES, on August 29th and 30th. Just click on the red link under the green and blue painting on this page, and get all the details. In answer to queries I've received, there will be ample time during both sessions for questions.

************************************************

When people consider healing exercises that tap into the mind-body connection, they tend to think of standardized visualizations or meditations that apply to everyone across the board.

After all, the pattern of conventional medical research is about claiming that one medicine fits all. You have X condition, you take drug Y.

This concept is thoroughly ingrained.

However, early in my research into mind-body healing exercises, I saw that uniform application was not the answer.

People are different. An exercise that may work for one person may be a dud for another person.

An exercise that may work for a person for three weeks may have no effect beyond that point.

I also noticed that some people who were given a specific exercise to do didn't, from the get-go, like the exercise. They were doing it because someone told them to do it.

Which is like telling someone he has to use his imagination in a prescribed way. It creates resistance. And the resistance shipwrecks the situation.

So what to do?

I came up with a simple answer. Present a whole range of exercises, and TELL THE PERSON TO START OUT BY CHOOSING ONE HE IS ATTRACTED TO.

Design the full range of exercises to tap into DIFFERENT ways of accessing healing energy.

Not everyone visualizes or meditates along the same channel. People have their own inclinations and abilities, when it comes to accessing energy.

Some people can visualize things clearly, from the outset. Others rely on feelings. Others use more abstract ideas. There are all sorts of styles.

So I constructed a set of exercises that approach healing energy from various directions.

Sometimes, you will see this: a person begins by doing an exercise that relies on feelings; then, after a while, he finds that he can visualize clearly and he wants to do THAT; or a person begins with visualizations, and later on he moves into feeling.

All sorts of crossovers occur.

Put ten people in front of an abstract painting and ask them what they get from it. One person will describe images he sees inside the shapes of the painting. Another person will tell you what he feels. Another person will relate ideas that occur to him.

Try to force everyone to experience the painting along the same channel and you'll arrive nowhere.

If healing is "the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow," it would be foolish to demand that everyone travel the rainbow in the same fashion. One person wants to ride in a car. Another wants to swim. Another feels like running.

At the heart of all healing exercises that tap into the mind-body connection, there is one quality: imagination.

But imagination does not work the same way for everyone.

Ideas, physical sensations, emotions, images, messages, sounds---there are many, many ways in which imagination manifests.

A person will tend to want to do a healing exercise that works the way HIS IMAGINATION WORKS.

When a person says, "I can't imagine anything," he usually means he can't imagine in THE PARTICULAR WAY HE'S BEEN TOLD TO. So he concludes he has no imagination.

But if that person is given access to an exercise that connects with THE WAY HE DOES, IN FACT, IMAGINE, everything changes.

And that's when he accesses healing energies. That's when mind-body healing occurs.

This is very important.

I have known people who imagine based on sound only. They listen to music, and all sorts of images and feelings and sensations arise from the sound. I have known people who come at imagination purely from a visual perspective. They see images, and then, from those images, feelings and sensations proceed. I have worked with people who imagine in terms of ideas. They chew on an idea for a while, and then they obtain very interesting sensations that have no easy labels.

So I have put under one roof a range of healing exercises that will allow people to come at healing energy from their own preferred ways. This works.

Another point: once a person has chosen a healing exercise to do, he may do it for a minute or six hours (over a period of weeks), and then everything dries up. He experiences no more energy. He gets nothing.

At that moment, the person usually thinks, "I'm blocked. I can't go further."

What to do?

It isn't really a block. If that person can find another exercise he wants to do from the list, he can get his engine operating well again. He can come at healing energy from a slightly different angle, and he's in business again. It's just a matter of shifting gears.

Everything I'm bringing up in this backgrounder is usually overlooked or minimized by people who hand out healing exercises to others. But these are key, key factors. They make all the difference.

I hope you'll be with me at the workshop. The mind-body connection is a vital part of healing, and it increases the value of everything else you're doing for your health.

JON RAPPOPORT www.nomorefakenews.com
=================================
http://www.nomorefakenews.com/archives/archiveview.php?key=2805

AUGUST 20, 2005. This is another backgrounder for my upcoming telephone workshop, DISEASE HOAXES AND HEALING EXERCISES. The workshop will take place on August 29 and 30. You do it from your home. Click on the red link under the green and blue painting on this page, and get the details. This one is going to be explosive.

***********************************************

In the spring of 1984, Dr. Robert Gallo and representatives of the US government announced that the cause of AIDS had been found. During this televised press conference, a virus was named. It would later be called HIV.

What very few people realized at the time was, Gallo, the purported hero, hadn't published a single paper that made a serious effort at PROVING that HIV was the cause of AIDS.

Until that moment, researchers at least paid lip service to the idea that you had to publish evidence, and that evidence had to be tested and retested by other scientists, before any conclusions about disease causation could be publicly advanced.

After all, this was what separated science from speculation.

But on that day in 1984, everything changed.

Even when many researchers realized that Gallo's claim of discovery was unsupported by the facts, all but a few of them remained silent. They gave up without a struggle.

The day after Gallo made his preemptive 1984 announcement, all government funding for AIDS research took a sharp right turn. Suddenly, there was no money for investigation into the cause of AIDS. Now, the $$ were slated for people who could establish the mechanism by which HIV attacked and destroyed the immune system.

So any potential rebellion in the ranks was squashed by the re-assignment of dollars.

While I was writing my first book, AIDS INC., in 1987, I discovered the above facts. I also learned that researchers don't simply cast a net into the water when they are searching for the cause of a disease. They are, from the outset, narrowing their field of inquiry.

Gallo had been researching the possible role of so-called retroviruses in cancer. Despite Gallo's optimistic assertions, this effort had yielded nothing of significance. But when the word AIDS appeared on the horizon, he decided to gather his forces and find money to keep researching this type of virus as a potential cause of AIDS. That was his territory, so he went with it.

But it was a strange starting point for him. If he thought that retroviruses caused cancer---which is all about out-of-control proliferation of cells---why would he think that retroviruses would be involved in the destruction of immune-system cells---the hallmark of AIDS?

As I wrote my book, I saw more and more holes in the HIV hypothesis. If HIV was not the cause of AIDS, then what was AIDS? The CDC had just issued a new definition of the disease, in which more and more so-called opportunistic illnesses were listed as markers for AIDS. It was asserted that these marker illnesses were ushered in by the initial immune-system collapse caused by HIV.

But if HIV was a fraudulent cause, then what we were left with? A whole host of diseases that were connected by nothing more than a word: AIDS.

And that word was being used to connect people in Haiti, starving people in Africa, heroin addicts in New York, gay men in San Francisco and New York, and hemophiliacs.

We were also assured that HIV would cause widespread deaths beyond those populations. AIDS, for example, would soon kill large numbers of heterosexual men in the US.

It never happened.

Why not? Was this the first germ that had such esoteric preferences for certain "risk groups?"

During the years since 1987, I met many people who had been diagnosed as HIV positive. They remained healthy, and the common denominator was, they hadn't taken the AIDS drugs.

I also met many people who told me stories about their healthy friends and family who had, on the strength of an HIV positive diagnosis, taken AZT, rapidly declined, and died.

AZT, a failed chemotherapy drug, attacks all cells of the body and destroys the ability of cells to reproduce. In other words, it kills.

The HIV blood test itself was riddled with flaws. A falsely positive result could ensue because of 60 or more factors that had nothing to do with HIV.

I deconstructed and reconstructed the AIDS legend. If you boldly and arbitrarily and falsely announced that a certain group---say, people who inhabited a certain park in a major city---had been exposed to a deadly germ; and if you then undertook a major propaganda campaign to convince these people to get tested for the germ; and if the test yielded false-positive results like crazy; and if you made a major push to have people who tested positive take a deadly drug; you would essentially be consigning these people to destruction.

Name a group. Any group. Put them through this step-by-step process, and many of them end up dead.

That was the assembly line. It still is.

In writing AIDS INC., I examined every so-called high-risk group for AIDS, and I found factors---non-viral factors---in each group that could easily account for the immune-system collapse that was being called AIDS. The factors tended to be different for each group. Some factors were recent. Some were age-old.

When I wrote AIDS INC., there were only a handful of recognized scientists who were speaking out against the fraudulent and death-dealing "research" behind AIDS. Among them, Peter Duesberg and Harvey Bialy. I had learned much from Peter and Harvey. Since those days, a number of other scientists have stepped up to the plate. They are largely ignored by the press.

Now we see stories in the press about a vaccine that will possibly work to prevent HIV from causing immune-system failure. Such a vaccine will, they say, produce antibodies against HIV in the body. This is taken to be a sign that the person is immune to HIV.

However, the standard HIV blood tests look for these same antibodies. If they are found, the person is said to be on the road to AIDS.

To say there is a confusion here is a vast understatement.

You see, traditionally, the production of antibodies, by the human body, was taken to be an indication that the body had warded off a disease. The germ entered the body, antibodies were produced against it, and the body knocked out the germ.

But with the advent of the AIDS legend, another rule was thrown out the window. Suddenly, antibodies to HIV were taken to be a gravely negative indicator.

Yet, even as the traditional rule was trashed, researchers were saying that a vaccine that induced those same antibodies was protective, was good, was a breakthrough.

In 1988, I spoke with a researcher at the National Institutes of Health. He told me that, when a vaccine was found, every person who took it would be given a letter. The letter would say that he was immune to HIV, and if he ever tested positive for HIV on a blood test, that result should ignored, because he was immune, not on the road to AIDS.

Antibodies naturally produced by the body against HIV=infected with the killer virus. The same antibodies produced by taking a vaccine=protective immunity.

There are researchers who understand this ridiculous and dangerous contradiction. But most of them will not speak out. As a well-known virologist at UCLA once said to me, "HIV is not an issue I'll comment on. It's political. That's all I'll say. There are other people in the research community you could approach, but they won't talk to you, either."

There is more to the AIDS story, and I'll be sharing some of that with you in the workshop.

JON RAPPOPORT www.nomorefakenews.com
=====================

The last one is perhaps the biggest hoax of it all. Have you seen an autopsy report which says, cause of death = AIDS? No. It usually will be TB, pneumonia or multiple organ failure etc etc.

Ever wondered why?